|
CIFA |
2009 PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS
FARMERS OF INDIA-VOTE WITH WISDOM
|
|
FINDINGS |
Arjun Sengupta Commission (NCEUS 2007) Findings on the plight of Small Farmers |
"Agriculture has become a relatively unrewarding profession due to generally unfavourable price regime and low value addition, causing abandoning of farming and increasing migration from rural areas….". |
| 1) High level of Indebtedness- Leading to Suicides |
Small and marginal farmers' households need credit to meet both consumption needs to maintain subsistence levels as well as for production purposes to meet the increasing costs of cultivation. Increased indebtedness is noted as a major reason for the spurt in farmer suicides during recent times the economic status of the suicide victim was very poor, being small and marginal farmers. Among the reasons for suicides, indebtedness featured as the prime reason. |
| 2) High costs-low returns-Nearly half the farmers dislike their occupation |
Economic organisation of farmers, particularly the marginal and small farmers, which could have helped them overcome the size constraint, is extremely insignificant. Rising costs of cultivation, low remunerations, high risks with frequent crop failures, declining agricultural growth, and mounting debts have all led the farmer to a distress like situation. Nearly 40 per cent of the farmer households disliked their occupation. The main reasons for this disinclination were the lack of viability of farming, followed by its perceived risks. |
| 3) Adverse changes in the banking policy since the economic reforms of 1991, reducing loan availability |
One of the key policy instruments to provide access to credit to the small industries was the RBI directions on 'priority sector' lending. The commercial banks were asked to advance 40 per cent of their net bank credit to the priority sector. This included the small and tiny enterprises for which, however, no separate targets were specified. However, there has been a change in the banking policy since the economic reforms of 1991. The concept of priority sector lending itself has come under attack, with the suggestion by the Narsimhan Committee Report (1993) that the 40 per cent direct credit to the priority sector should be phased out. While this recommendation has not been implemented, there has been a dilution of the priority sector lending policy. The operational relevance of the priority sector lending has been weakened by the inclusion of a vast number of items, including agricultural machinery, direct finance to the housing sector etc.
Agriculture in the early periods was facilitated by the spread of rural credit institutions and improved access to credit. A step in this direction was the nationalisation of banks in 1969 and making imperative that the banks expand their rural coverage. The Commission is concerned that the position of institutional credit with respect to agriculture and more so, with respect to marginal and small farmers continues to be extremely unsatisfactory. The share of agricultural credit in the Net Bank Credit (NBC) declined from 17per cent in 1994 to 9 per cent in 2004. Agricultural credit as a percentage of NBC it still stands at a low 12 % in 2006. The number of commercial banks branches in rural areas declined from 35,134 in March 1991 to 30,572 in March 2006.A large number of staff vacancies remains unfilled for quite some time. |
4) Apathy and dilution at policy level |
A close look at RBI guide lines/directives to banks, reveal that apathy either deliberately or by mistake also exists at the top and policy planning level…as the credit system operating under the existing guidelines of RBI. It emerges that small borrowers are competing with large and strong borrowers. The coverage under priority sector lending has increasingly been diluted, enabling big borrower loans at the direct expense of small borrower. The scope and definition of the priority sector, once dominated by small farm related loans, were enlarged by including new items and by enhancing credit limits of constituent sub-sectors to more than Rs.40 lakh. Over the years particularly after the mid-nineties, relatively high credit worthy activities like housing, education, transportation and loans to professionals have been included in the priority sector. This has affected unfavourably the credit flow to the needy sector. |
5) Commission’s recommendations
|
| |
DEMANDS
|
|
(i)Change in the priority sector guidelines with a target of 10 per cent needs to be fixed for marginal and small farmers. The agricultural quota includes direct agricultural loans to corporate entities up to Rs.1 Crore and for even higher amounts for indirect agricultural activities. The Commission recommends that the priority sector guidelines of the RBI be amended and a 10 per cent quota, out of the 18 per cent assigned to small and marginal farmers.
(ii) Close monitoring by RBI of the credit flow to this segment of farmers i.e. marginal and small farmers; be fixed for farmers with land holdings below 2 hectares
(iii) Extend credit to the 20 – 40 % of the marginal and small farmers who are excluded from the formal financial sector due to lack of patta and title deeds.
(iv) Government may set up a Credit Guarantee Fund in NABARD, on the lines of the CGF set up by the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises which provides guarantee cover on loans to small units.
|
TO DATE, THESE RECOMMENDATIONS WHICH WILL HELP SMALL FARMERS AND SMALL ENTERPRISES ARE NOT IMPLEMENTED
Observations of Consortium of Indian Farmers Associations (CIFA)
|
In post reform era, there has been studied indifference of financing priority sectors. Neither the Government nor the RBI, bothered to reverse the trend. The RBI also very silently refined priority sector and allowed loans given to big borrowers also to be included under this category. It is very clear that during the decade commencing from 1991, the successive governments neglected loaning to agriculture sector, the RBI was a silent spectator and banks took cue from this and decelerated the quantum of loaning to priority sectors. Now is the time for implementing forthwith the recommendations of NCEUS to better the lot of Marginal and Small Farmers, who constitute more than 80% of all the farmers and all enterprises.
Local issues may be added. |
| Published by: |
| Mr. Basavaraj Tambake, Chairman & |
P. Chengal Reddy, Secretary General |
| Consortium of Indian Farmers Associations (CIFA) |
8/32, South Patel Nagar, New Delhi |
| Ph: 011 25842111, Fax: 011 25842123 |
| Email: cifa_delhi@yahoo.com |
Web: www.indianfarmers.org |
|
|
States / Local Leaders to print their address and Telephone Nos. etc. |
|
|
|